National Review

Bill Buckley is sorely missed, but I still enjoy reading the analysis of the National Review for political news.

National Review Online is a conundrum of a website that has surrendered free speech to what can only be described as politically correct trolls who, through a looking glass, practice the very suppression of free speech that conservatives accurately accuse far left web venues of practicing. Supposedly a far-reaching and open venue that is available to interested persons throughout the political world, the apparent truth that I have discovered, through interaction on discussion boards at NRO, is this: Extremely small-minded, vulgar, provocative, and unreasonable "conservatives" have free rein to throw grotesque and "fighting words" levels of insults into their message board messages to debate opponents, and are then protected from rebuttal in kind by "moderators" (think Orwellian censorship).

The NRO "version" of being conservative, at least on their message boards, is "toe the line, peons, and interact like good little boy and girl victims when our conservatrolls come to take their pound of flesh out of you." NRO = Not behaving sweetly? DELETION for you...!

Virtually NOTHING perturbs me more than speech suppression, and NRO practices EXCESSIVE speech suppression. Remember that if you decide to visit their site.

I'm generally right-wing or middle-ground in my policies stance, depending on what the issue is.

I just can't believe how jewishly or deceptively this site is set up, just like the way a leftwing fake news network usually is set up, so is it conservative in name/title alone, and is actually the same thing?

For example, there is 0 information how to 'make an account', logging in gives some helper-image like you have a physical account number; that's fine with me, I have nothing to hide. But there's absolutely no registration or info how to get to that comment section- so in the same way as any fake news site that the leftwing would fill with fake bots comments, approved insults, and regulate the comments and perceived opinion, there is deceptively 'no real comments section' to use, because you can't even begin to login to it. What is this 'account number', should I print out like phsyical bank number to verify I was a real person first?

The actual media and artwork looks top notch. I saw some articles I can agree with in opinion and with their motive.

However I mainly just saw one article and it's conducted in the same way in my opinion. Again, I do actually agree with most of the articles, but it's not conservative if it's not open forum, with no deception, showing really the leftwing (jewish) type of way is not even required to maintain the rightwing (conservative) way, because it holds up to open scrutiny regardless.

E.g.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/judge-orders-trump-not-to-release-evidence-in-classified-documents-case/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_medium=push&utm_campaign=article
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/former-ag-barr-slams-defiant-nine-year-old-trump-our-country-cant-be-a-therapy-session/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=native-latest&utm_term=first