I took out a joint mortgage with my boyfriend.
Without my knowledge Nat West facilitated my ex boyfriend in two further mortgages by releasing equity on a joint property to an unemployed man.
Money was transferred into his current account.
I was working full time, had no idea that NAT WEST could do any of this without a conversation or permission from myself.
I've been told the paperwork is missing: several times: then it's found when I ring up: then it's missing again. How about accepting fault & relaying me for the mistakes I did not make.
I signed nothing, had no knowledge or conversation about my mortgage being doubled- this is a financial abuse.
Nat West are corrupt.
I was given no choice in repaying my ex partners debts to Nat West because my name was on them!
The attitude Women are up against is chauvinism at its finest.
He was the 'man' in charge of my finances.
Bizarre practices to exclude women from debts being raised in their name.
There was no chance I would have sanctioned or agreed with any of these loans on my house: I could barely afford the mortgage & bills, being the only bread winner for 8 years.
Why did NAT WEST exclude me from such a life changing conversation.
Nat West - stone walling - losing paperwork is when convenient - I have a copy of my ex boyfriends correspondence. - note I'm not mentioned by him & the money was credited into his vector account (ie his personal loan at HSBC ;)