Alec D.

Another disturbing example of nextdoor censorship, this time seeking to empower a bunch of old ladies with the attitude of "you must not discuss politics or religion, and everything must be 'peaches and cream.' " Please see the attached screenshot for a specific example. The screenshot is large and you'll need to open it up in its own browser tab to be able to read it. Particularly disturbing is nextdoor intentionally not showing, to even you from your own profile, your posts they've "hidden," with the intent of making it impossible for you to access those posts and challenge the "hiding" of those posts. As always, the goal of that censorship is to try to prevent accountability for the rampant government corruption that's infested the U.S. and that is currently hurting people in their everyday lives.

I posted a thread on facebook on 4 November 2021 referencing articles from mainstream sources that warned of the dangers of the COVID19 "vaccine."

Facebook claims to be a "neutral platform" where everyone can publicly express their concerns. Too many people believe that claim. In reality, facebook is a propaganda machine of the corrupt political elite to try to keep that elite in power.

Facebook censored my thread there on 10 January 2022, two months after it was first posted, and just when it was starting to get exposure and when it started including references from government websites that directly contradict the government's fraudulent claims of COVID19 being a "pandemic." Facebook can't claim it only became aware of my thread on 10 January 2022 since, within 3 days of my having originally posted my thread there, facebook pasted the following sticky on it: "Visit the COVID-19 Information Center for vaccine resources."

Facebook's censorship tactics are far more deceitful than even twitter's, since twitter flat out censor's you whereas facebook censors you only when your posts gain awareness, the obvious intent of that being to dupe people at first sight into falsely and dangerously believing that "facebook is an open and neutral platform." Facebook needs to lose its Section 230 shield so it can be sued as a publisher and held accountable for its censorship. It's obviously not the "neutral platform" that Section 230 requires.

Further details are at: http://themanwithyourplan.com/users/bankfrauddetails/documents/socialism-communism-exposed/COVID19/thread1/main.shtml

To change the email address used for login ID, password and account recovery, that you have on file with Survey Junkie, you have to create a new account and they deactivate the old account, which isn't too much of a problem. The problem occurs when you try to redeem points from the new Survey Junkie account. Survey Junkie refuses to let you connect the bank account you used for your old Survey Junkie account, and insists on keeping that bank account tied to the old Survey Junkie account. This creates a security risk to the bank account you attached to the old Survey Junkie account, especially if someone else were to claim the old email address that you used for your old Survey Junkie account.

Even worse, is Survey Junkie's arrogant response of "Please also note that users are solely responsible for the security of their usernames and passwords and will be solely liable and responsible for any use, whether authorized or unauthorized, of their membership accounts," especially since they hold you hostage to old usernames and passwords that have gone bad.