Actionlove

I'm not into viewing porn content stuff, since that site is store-ish, but that site made hackershomepage.com look better. I know this site is outdated, since it was made during the early years the internet was born, but this website is still up right now. -Site has HUGE BLOCKS OF TEXT without any "panel" or boxes to separate sections on a page. Combined with no linebreak in between each paragraph. This website reminds me of an a 5+ page essay assignment. And yes, the website is very tall due to this. --Most of the font effects (colors, size, italic, bold, strike through, etc) don't "end" until the end of a "section". Meaning the HTML code of the site was poorly written, with the HTML tags that uses "</X>" (X means any html tag, such as "</b>" to end a bold font) placed FAR later on the sentence string, or even forgotten. -Too many hyperlinks: many professional website uses a "tab" system to minimize similar items hide in one "show/hide" button. That site does not know how to do that. --Not only that, the whole site is a HYPERLINK MAZE. Look, if you go to any other site, they organize content in each section. This website, anything goes, without even a navigation bar that shows a "directory" of how you got there. It's easy to get loss in this website. The URL doesn't help at all, since most of the time, they rather use "ID number" rather than "parent/child/specificwebpagename". -No title of the website. It just barges you with information without telling what this website is other than a warning its for 18+. -Overuse of font colors. Just look at the main page. -Images have GODAWFUL resolution with opaque solid color backgrounds. Is that made using Microsoft paint? There are some odd grey color on some images involving text being resized, probably due to poorly edited images. --Like hackershomepage, it uses OPAQUE copyright watermarks. You could at least use google drive's apps such as google slides, make the object transparent, then print-screen that. Even the watermarks have distorted text since they RESIZED the image resolution (pixel loss). Same goes for the ads (but without the watermark) Overall the whole website is painful for someone (who is a pr0nographic) to use. Have the author of the website ever visited another website? The quote "Less is more" pretty much say what this site should've done.