Thumbnail of user kaywhyj

KayWhy J.

Contributor Level

Total Points
10

1 Review by KayWhy

  • Fuckbook

2/20/16

The site has nothing to do with "hooking up". Members aren't allowed to share contact information. If a member voices an opinion not in favor of the sites practices, they delete that account. The site has shady business practices with promising sex for a membership fee and with absolutely no intentions of allowing adults to exchange contact information. Does that sound like a hookup/dating site or a rip off? Not rendering services after payment is made is thievery. And don't forget that it's a reoccurring automatic payment made through a members card and the site certainly doesn't make it easy for an unhappy member to stop them from stealing that monthly prick tease fee. The site is a members generated porn site, that's all it is. You definitely "can't get no, satisfaction" from $#*!book or any of the backdoor site names going to the same site. The ratings scale should go into the negative digits for this particular crap site and all its side and backdoor site names.

Thumbnail of user fuckbooks
$#*!book S. – Fuckbook Rep

We are sorry you did not enjoy your stay on our site. We are not offering sex for a membership fee, the fee is to allow the use the premium features of the site. We discourage posting public contact information to protect our members from online phishing scams. We appreciate all feedback (good or bad) and if you wish to discuss this or any other concerns please contact us at support@$#*! book.com.

KayWhy Has Earned 10 Votes

Kaywhy J.'s review of Fuckbook earned 10 Very Helpful votes

KayWhy hasn’t received any thanks yous.

KayWhy doesn’t have any fans yet.

KayWhy isn’t following anybody yet.

Empty.

Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber

Thumbnail of user jayn672
Jay N. reviewed Fuckbook
3/7/24

Once you pay, all messages and friend requests stop. PLEASE DON'T FALL FOR THIS. Trust these 1...

Thumbnail of user delacroixm
4/22/23

The comment from the site in question is this: "There is too many incorrect statements here to...