Sarita N.

I love Constant Content. They're standards are high, and yes, you have to know your grammar and punctuation, but if you're good at that, then you'll have a high acceptance rate. The editors read your article after you submit it and if they come to a mistake, they immediately stop reading. That's why when you fix the mistake, it might be rejected again later - because they didn't read the whole thing. It wastes their time to read the whole article if there's a bunch of mistakes. YOU need to be able to self-edit. If you can do that, then the site is worth it. As far as Constant Content stealing your ideas and reselling them, that's ridiculous. There's a short summary feature where you post at least a third of your article for clients to see - some writers post the whole thing. There will always be some shady dude looking to make some money off of your article and they may rewrite and spin your article and post it to another site. That's the risk you take when posting a large portion of your article for prospective clients.

I love Constant Content - I've found that my energy and health and fitness articles sell very well, and I consistently make about $35 to $40 dollars (after CC's cut) for 400 to 500 word articles, which is light years ahead of what you will get at most content mills. Give them a shot - they're worth it!