I've always thought of L. L. Bean as being an excellent manufacturer of clothing. Yes, their prices are more expensive than other mainstream manufacturers, but I've never really minded those extra costs because they are purported to have one of the best warranties in their industry. In fact, they used to offer a lifetime warranty but had to stop it a few years ago after apparent abuses – but, to me, that didn't matter very much because they still offer a 1-year return on their clothing and will even consider older clothing for returns due to defective materials or craftsmanship. Because of this, I've always had a certain peace-of-mind about paying the extra costs that L. L. Bean demands.
However, after trying to replace a pair of jeans after 22 months, I realized their "guarantees" aren't as solid as they seem to want you to believe.
In January 2020, I purchased 3 pair of jeans under Item #: TC******* in 3 different colors for $49.95 each. One of them (the Faded Denim) has started to wear quite badly in the corners of both back pockets. In fact, on one of the pockets, you can see straight through the material. In November 2021, I sent the jeans, along with my original receipt and pictures to their RMA department for consideration for replacement and was told that my warranty claim was denied because, in their opinion, the jeans had worn from normal wear-and-tear. I explained that I only wear jeans occasionally, I only wear them for causal use (not for work), and I have several other L. L. Bean jeans which have not suffered the same issue. Unfortunately, none of it mattered and she reiterated, to her, it looks like normal wear-and-tear.
I live in south Texas - we only wear jeans a handful of weeks throughout the year. Even then, I only wear my nice jeans (L. L. Bean) for holiday gatherings, family outings, or other events where I know they're not going to be destroyed. My other L. L. Bean jeans, (which are in great condition) are evident of that. It seems clear that these were just a defective pair, but they wanted to stick to their conclusion.
Over the past 5 years, I've spent $3,943 on L. L. Bean clothing and, up until now, I've been very happy with their quality. I wasn't even worried about these defective jeans because I know bad manufacturing happens sometimes and I'd never had any faulty clothing from them before.
To me, L. L. Bean has painted a picture that they weren't really concerned about the customer service, so, to that end, I have returned my most recent order of $224 (which they did refund) and when my family and friends ask where I get my nice clothes from, I will be answering with a different manufacturer and will dissuade them from considering L. L. Bean. Yes, their clothes do look nice, but their costs are simply too high to chance on a product that might fail after less than 50 uses.