Joshi K.

Peer Review Process

Peer Review is defined as "a process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field". Peer review
Is intended to serve two primary purposes.

Types of Peer Review Process

Ø Single blind review: The names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. This is the traditional method of reviewing and is the most common type by far.

Ø Double-blind review: Double-blind peer review means the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept hidden. If the authors' identity is unknown to the reviewer,
It will prevent the reviewer from forming any bias. There are advantages and
Disadvantages associated with double-blind reviewing here are some of the
More common ones.

Ø Open review: Reviewer and author are known to each other.

Lupine Publishers Peer Review Process:

Peer review process begins with when an author completes a research study and writes a manuscript that describes the purpose, experimental design, results, and conclusions
Of the study. The scientist then submits this paper to a suitable journal that specializes in a relevant research field, a step referred to as pre-submission.

The editors of the journal will review the paper to ensure that the subject matter is in line with that of the journal, and that it fits with the editorial platform. Very few papers pass this initial evaluation. If the journal editors feel the paper sufficiently meets these requirements and is written by a credible source, they will send the paper to accomplished researchers in the field for a formal peer review.

Lupine Publishers follow double blind peer review process.

As the identity of both author and editor are kept hidden it will prevent the reviewer from forming any bias. So, we will get high quality manuscripts. Coming to the double bling peer review process which is followed by our Lupine Publishers is when an article is submitted by the author to our journal then we will assign this article to our journal editors who are experts in that research field without mentioning author details. Then the editor will review the article whether it will fall under the scope of our journal or not then after getting review comments and acceptance from those editors we will proceed for the further process i. E., gallery proof and PDF of the manuscript. If the article does not meet the standards of our journal then we will ask the authorfor the revised manuscript without mentioning editor details and after getting revised manuscript then again, we will assign the revised manuscript to our journal editors.

Thus, the articles which can meet the good scientific standards in acknowledge and build upon other work in the field, rely on logical reasoning and well-designed studies etc. are accepted for publication. In this peer review process once it is accepted by the Editor for publication within 1 week the article will be published. Thus, the peer-reviewed articles provide a trusted form of scientific communication. Even if the author is unfamiliar with the topic,
We can trust peer-reviewed work which meet certain standards of scientific quality. Since scientific knowledge is more cumulative and builds on itself, this trust is particularly important. Once a piece of scientific research passes through peer review and is published then we should trust the publishers which follow the Peer Review Process.

Peer Review Process functions to encourage authors to meet the accepted high standards of their discipline and to control the dissemination of research data to ensure
That unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations or personal views are not
Published without prior expert review. Peer review is intended to serve two primary purposes. Firstly, it acts as a filter to ensure that only high-quality research is published, especially in reputable journals, by determining the validity, significance and originality of the study. Secondly, peer review is intended to improve the quality of manuscripts
That are deemed suitable for publication. Peer reviewers provide suggestions to authors on how to improve the quality of their manuscripts and identify any errors that need correcting before publication.